Risky Behavior at Wittenberg

March 21, 2011

by Chidem Kurdas

Watching Wittenberg at the Pearl Theater in New York took a group of us back to our graduate school days. This is a surprisingly entertaining comedy, creating merriment out of a mash of classical characters, modern themes and serious philosophy.

The year is 1517.  Two academics at Wittenberg University, Martin Luther and John Faustus, are more or less cordial colleagues but intellectual antagonists.

Both are dissatisfied. Dr. Faustus holds four graduate degrees – in medicine, law, philosophy and theology – but has found all this knowledge lacking. On top of that, the woman he loves leaves him.  Father Luther detests the Church’s selling of indulgences but feels he can’t do anything about it. Their star pupil, a Danish prince named Hamlet, is confused.

In this play written by David Davalos, Faustus is the driving force—-Scott Greer plays him with just the right mix of intellectual fire, cool confidence and disappointed passion. Faustus, who gets Luther to write his 95 Theses and confront the Church’s corrupt ways, comes across as a risk-loving man who seeks every experience. When he’s not disputing, counseling, reading manuscripts or cavorting with an ex-nun, he makes music at the local bar. The beery bar scenes are wonderfully funny.

In an obvious symbolism, Luther can be taken to represent faith  and Faustus reason. But these two themes cross over—-Luther applies reason to criticize the Catholic Church while Faustus wants to believe that science is salvation.

As fleshed out at the Pearl Theater, the two characters differ in one crucial respect. Luther is careful about risk; in the end he defies the Church hierarchy but only after making a careful case as to why he has to do this. By contrast, Faustus is willing to take open-ended risks without understanding the full extent of the danger. He could be a 1960s hippie experimenting with drugs—-he does not recognize that while some rules may be flaunted with no ill effect, other rules are there for a good reason.

Ambitious Faustus hopes that Hamlet will become the philosopher king who will apply his teachings; hence he is outraged when Luther tries to turn Hamlet into a monk. Then Hamlet gets a letter from his mother, telling him his father is dead and he should return  home. We know Hamlet will never become king and is condemned to “not to be” in Elsinore. Staying at Wittenberg with Luther would have been a better bet. Faustus’ counsel is wrong.

The character Faustus or Faust comes from a German legend possibly inspired by a historical person, Dr. Johann Faust from Wittenberg, an alchemist.  While the best known literary works based on the character are by Christopher Marlowe and Goethe, there are many stories around the idea of a scholar or artist who sells his soul to the devil to gain knowledge.

Most versions end with the devil coming out ahead in the deal, though in the country song “The Devil Went Down to Georgia”  a contest with a young fiddler results in the devil losing his bet.

The moral might be that unless you know what you’re getting into and why, you’d better not transact with the devil. But under certain circumstances you may be able to get away with something like 95 theses—these days you’d put them on the Net rather than on a door.

15 Responses to “Risky Behavior at Wittenberg”

  1. Bogdan Enache Says:

    Sounds like a great play.

  2. Mario Rizzo Says:

    Seriously, I’d like to see “95 Theses” posted on the door of the Capitol. Great review, Chidem.

  3. chidemkurdas Says:

    Thanks Mario and Bogdan. This comedy is thought inspiring, even when the dialogue is about Martin Luther’s privy. I found myself thinking about it for days.


  4. My understanding is that Luther’s objection to the selling of indulgences was not so much the corruption involved, but the faulty theology underlying the practice. If we are saved by grace, we are powerless to achieve our own salvation. I stand to be corrected by a serious Lutheran on this.

  5. chidemkurdas Says:

    That’s an intriguing question, Jerry. The play gives the impression that he objects both to the theology & the corruption — greed causing theological distortion — but the writer may be taking poetic license.

  6. Troy Camplin Says:

    That does sound like a great play. The Pearl sounds like the kind of theater that might perform my play The Existentialists. I’ll have to check them out.

  7. chidemkurdas Says:

    Troy, yes, do it. And there are some smaller groups in NY that might be interested in your play.

    I’m not sure about your title, though.

  8. Troy Camplin Says:

    The main characters are Sartre, Jaspers, Camus, de Beauvoir, and Heidegger. I’m open to suggestions, though.

  9. chidemkurdas Says:

    “To Exist or not to Exist”? No, that doesn’t work. But I really like the cast of characters–you can do a lot with them. Jaspers was a teacher of Hannah Arendt and long-time correspondent of hers. He was not an existentialist, as I recall. Heidegger, of course, was her boyfriend when she was at the university where he taught. That was before he became a Nazi.

    Maybe a non-philosophical title like “Lovers”?

  10. Troy Camplin Says:

    Actually, it’s a tragedy. I dramatize the split between Camus and Sartre. I have a synopsis here:

    http://zatavu.blogspot.com/2008/01/synopsis-of-existentialists.html

    Jaspers, who coined the term “Existenzphilosophie,” is typically listed, along with Heidegger, Sartre, and Camus, as an Existentialist, though only Sartre called himself such, and the rest insisted they were not.

    There is a whole other story one could tell with the Jaspers-Arednt-Heidegger connection.

  11. chidemkurdas Says:

    OK, I see. Some Greek tragedies use main characters’ names as titles, but calling your tragedy “Sartre” probably won’t help. “The Philosopher”? if there no play already by that title.

  12. Troy Camplin Says:

    Aeschylus used groups with “The Suppliants” and “The Persians,” but Sophocles and Euripides did tend to use names. The conflict comes about in the political choices among those who otherwise seem to share similar world views. And the satyr play demonstrates how superficial a philosophy can become. Which is why I went with The Existentialists in the first place. Hmmm. Have to think on it. I want to capture these various facets.

  13. chidemkurdas Says:

    It’s interesting. There’s a novel by de Beauvoir called “The Mandarins” that includes Sartre as a character. Another of her novels is “The Blood of Others,” which is concerned with individual responsibility.

    Well, best luck.

  14. Troy Camplin Says:

    I have “The Mandarins” on my book shelf. Haven’t read it yet. I’ve read her autobiographical “An Easy Death.” Perhaps something about death, time, and/or nothingness.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,715 other followers

%d bloggers like this: