A “Kleinian” Version of Austrian Business Cycle Theory

September 10, 2012

by Gene Callahan

The next phase in my (now our, as I’ve taken on a colleague) project of thinking through Dan Klein’s Knowledge and Coordination is to see how his ideas might be used to help describe business cycle theories and demonstrate commonalities they share. Note: the point of the present exercise is simply to try to describe an existing business cycle theory in Kleinian terms, not to improve upon it or argue for its accuracy.

We will begin with the Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle:

As we have seen, concatenate coordination need not be coordination from the perspective of “Joy,” Klein’s impartial observer. Others may have more partial notions of concatenate coordination, which they may strive to achieve.

For instance, “the  bankers” (of course, we don’t mean to posit a monolithic group, but we can envision common interests) might have a vision of concatenate coordination that includes a regime of easy money, low interest rates, and central backing for banks so that they can’t go bust. Banks envision an eternal boom.

But this easy money regime disrupts the attempts of savers and investors to achieve mutual coordination: savers will be willing to save less than investors are willing to invest at the artificially low interest rate. Thus, the bankers attempt to achieve their preferred concatenate coordination has produced poor mutual coordination among others.

The investors adjust to this disruption by lengthening the capital structure, while savers save less and consume more. This produces a capital structure being stretched at both ends and growing holes in its middle like pulled taffy, a la Garrison’s description.

This failure to achieve mutual coordination is finally revealed in the bust, when the fact that many ongoing capital projects will not be completed can no longer be disguised. This situation generally strikes everyone as failing to achieve concatenate coordination.

In response to this obvious failure, many, remembering the good times of the boom, believe the remedy is easy money and low interest rates. Thus we return to step one, and have a true cycle theory.

3 Responses to “A “Kleinian” Version of Austrian Business Cycle Theory”

  1. ilir Deebran Says:

    It’s impossible to understand the business cycle without having a better understanding of economic growth. Alex Gheg has a new consumer theory that gives us a scale for growth that measures previously hidden thoughts. We can measure utility growth. Quantity, quality, variety and convenience in one equation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6tFLGpcOpE

  2. Malcolm Says:

    We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme
    in our community. Your site offered us with valuable information to work on.

    You’ve done an impressive job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

  3. Jason Says:

    Wonderful site. Lots of helpful information here. I am sending it to some buddies ans additionally sharing
    in delicious. And of course, thank you in your effort!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,733 other followers

%d bloggers like this: