Webcombd is a website design company from Bangladesh with sole emphasis on providing professional and qualit web design, graphics design, and multimedia solutions. We are professional, dedicated, flexible, experienced and affordable. Aesthetics, user friendliness, and functionality are built into all our solutions to ensure that your web venture is a success.

webcombd is the best bangladesh web design company based in Lalmatia, Dhaka and operating since 2003. Besides catering to clients from Bangladesh, we also provide outsoure services. Read More about http://web.com.bd/ for web development.

Giving workers in Bangladesh a better wage and working conditions might seem like the best idea ever, but it comes with opportunity costs. For example, the owner might have been able to open another low cost factory and employ a few hundred garment workers, but because of the renovation costs for his old factory, he can’t afford the new one.

If the people who petitioned for better working conditions were given a choice of either A: Same working condition but 500 more people are given jobs due to opening of a new factory or B: Renovated building, layoffs due to higher operating cost. I am certain that a person would vote for choice A.

A higher opportunity cost will be imposed on the garment workers, if they choose to work else where (for example, in safer conditions). Working in the factories is their best available option.

This trend has been seen throughout history. During the Industrial Revolution in Britain, demand for industrial workers rose, so farm workers sought work in industry. The working conditions in the factories were poor and dangerous, but it was the workers’ best option. They were able to obtain higher wages working in the factories than working in the fields. The same holds true for the United States.

As countries become more developed they will be able to implement safer working conditions without much sacrifice.

Many corporations residing in developed countries are ensuring that their suppliers meet safety requirements because their reputations might be affected when their customers find out how the clothes were made. The corporations are really just looking out for their best interest, not the interests of the workers in developing countries, when they demand better working conditions from their suppliers.

From what I have read, the company occupying the building thought it was safe. The building was unsafe because the construction company cut corners and used shoddy materials. How was the building’s owner or occupier to know that had been done? Construction companies can easily hide bad construction. The only ones who would know the building was bad were the construction company and the inspector, who the company bribed to ignore the bad construction.

This type of corruption is a huge problem throughout the world, but especially in the poorest nations. It’s extremely arrogant of the US and Europe to think they can change the culture of 2/3 of the world and direct their construction methods from the comfort of their first world recliners by pressuring the retail stores they buy clothing from.

Pope Francis worked extensively with many evangelicals and (free market oreinted) missionaries over the past 20 years in S. America that not only preached personal responsibility for individuals but was very influential with leaders from Chile which had a profound (positive) impact.

But it isn’t his job to water or distort the “Gospel” for the sake of any political or economic outcome. You’re statement: “He looks only to intentions (Do good!)” is woefully naive to his (or Jesus Christ’s) message. It is about accepting the free gift of righteousness and faith in God WITHOUT expecting you are judged according to performance (what evangelicals would refer to as “the law”.)

What you certainly seem oblivious to is the direct correlation of the SPIRITUAL health of a nation and it’s ensuing blessings which include the acceptance of knowledge. While I agree it is an observable fact that say, more economic freedom creates more wealth for the poor, it totally ignores the social science evidence that a leadership (or people) don’t WANT those freedoms unless they have faith something other than government is looking out for them.

At that, you contradict yourself when you say he was making the point that it could take a long time for an economy to regain equilibrium. That is time, clock time, calendar time, not quite geological time.

However, you are over complicating it by any rational standard. It is still years to decades of suffering until prosperity becomes general again, if not lifetimes.