A coffeehouse puzzle

by Sandy Ikeda

An article in “The City” section of The New York Times yesterday (30 November), “Where plugging in means paying up,” raises several interesting questions.  It’s about a café that charges customers to use its electricity, which is evidently an unusual enough practice these days to warrant a Times story.  Why don’t more places do this?  Is electricity that cheap?  Is it because the computer phenomenon is relatively new and business practice hasn’t quite caught on?

5 thoughts on “A coffeehouse puzzle

  1. The scarce resource isn’t the net connection, or the power. It’s tables and chairs. If a café doesn’t charge for net or power, a customer can buy one cup of coffee and tie up a table all day. It’s easiest to restrict the net, as Starbucks does. You get two hours if you use a Starbucks card, or otherwise you pay. Second easiest is charging for power. Actually locking up the tables and chairs (the thing you’re trying to sell) would be hardest.

  2. What’s the difference between “tying up” a table for hours while using a computer and doing the same while reading a book? I don’t expect charging for power/wifi to become a popular thing because it’s a pain to charge for every little thing — transaction costs and all that. I would think if electricity costs became a burden or space got scarce a cafe might ban computers altogether (some cafes do this now) or raise prices across the board.

  3. Jeremy,

    Isn’t the difference simply that lots of people linger forever with their computers, whereas not so many linger with books?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s