Why Not A Big Tax Cut?

December 4, 2008

Chidem Kurdas

We have an exact measure of the most recent recognition lag. This month the National Bureau of Economic Research identified the beginning of the current recession as December 2007. So the lag is about a year.  Click for NBER You’ll recall that in the 1950s Milton Friedman pointed to the time it takes economists to recognize a recession as one of the lags that reduce the effectiveness of counter-cyclical federal spending. While aiming to stabilize economic activity, such programs cause instability if the recession is already passing. In the 1990s Martin Feldstein argued that counter-cyclical fiscal policy has a role to play in the case of a sustained downturn such as the one that afflicted Japan. Professor Feldstein’s point has obvious relevance for the US. Click for Feldstein comment  

 

But there is another issue. Friedman favored tax cuts rather than expenditure increases if the federal budget has to be used to boost aggregate demand. It may be objected that consumers would not spend enough at a time like this, with confidence at low ebb. But surely that depends on the size and time horizon of the tax break.

The Bush tax rebate was a small one-shot affair, so it had a temporary effect. Why not an across-the-board, two-year cut in the federal income tax, retroactive to December 2007? Make it 20% or more, and I know it would change my perspective as a consumer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8 Responses to “Why Not A Big Tax Cut?”

  1. dg lesvic Says:

    How about the most affirmative action, tax emption for Blacks?

  2. Roger Koppl Says:

    dg:
    Who is Blacks?

  3. dg lesvic Says:

    Black people, African Americans.

  4. koppl Says:

    Oh dear. I suppose your comment was meant to be droll . . . Well, I’ll let it drop.

  5. koppl Says:

    Oh dear. I suppose your comment was meant to be droll . . .

  6. dg lesvic Says:

    No, it’s a serious proposal.

    What I would really like was tax exemption for everyone.

    But, I’ll take what I can get, and, if we must have Affirmative Action, why not the most affirmative of all, Tax Exemption for Blacks?

  7. chidemkurdas Says:

    That’s fine with me as long as there’s also an exemption for women named Chidem Kurdas. I suspect, though, that giving it to some people will be an open invitation for intense lobbying by other groups–consider the line for bailouts.

  8. dg lesvic Says:

    chidemandridem.

    You wrote:

    “That’s fine with me as long as there’s also an exemption for women named Chidem Kurdas.”

    You got it, and everyone else in line, if I have anything to say about it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: