by Roger Koppl
According to Associated Press, “Bahamas using 2 experts for Travolta son autopsy.” (HT Ed Lopez.) Actor John Travolta’s son Jett died tragically on Friday, January 2nd, after hitting his head in a fall. (It seems he had an illness that left him subject to seizures.) The E! News story says, “A government official confirms to E! News that the autopsy will be conducted in Freeport by two separate pathologists to ensure accuracy of the results.”
I approve. Neither pathologist should have an epistemic monopoly in this case. I especially appreciate the use of pathologists who are “separate.” They should not work together and each should remain ignorant of the other’s conclusions.
The principle of redundancy in forensic science and medico-legal investigation is little more than common sense. I often talk about it in terms of breaking the forensic or epistemic monopoly of our crime labs. I also sometimes say, “My message to the forensic science community is simple: When you going motoring, put a spare tire in your trunk.” It looks rather as if the authorities in the Bahamas have got the basic idea of redundancy in forensic science and medico-legal investigation – at least for the rich and famous. Shouldn’t the same principle apply to indigent defendants in the criminal courts of the United States?