Earthquake, shmearthquake

May 29, 2009

by Sandy Ikeda

“To Protect an Ancient City, China Moves to Raze It” The city is Kashgar, “the best-preserved example of a traditional Islamic city to be found anywhere in central Asia….”

Local authorities claim that by pre-emptively demolishing 85% of it they will be protecting its citizens from the kind of catastrophe that befell Chengdu last year. As Robert Moses was fond of saying:  “If the ends don’t justify the means, what does?” But what’s the real end? Is it a coincidence that

Chinese security officials consider it a breeding ground for a small but resilient movement of Uighur separatists who Beijing claims have ties to international jihadis. So redevelopment of this ancient center of Islamic culture comes with a tinge of forced conformity.

Still, the same thing has been happening to the ancient neighborhoods (hutongs) right in the heart of Beijing for more than a decade. So, perhaps it’s something else.

Economic stimulus? After all, who cares about mere allocation effects?

3 Responses to “Earthquake, shmearthquake”

  1. Ralph Says:

    and this is different from the USA’s Urban Renewal how?

  2. Sandy Ikeda Says:

    Not much…. I’d blogged this about Flint, Michigan a few weeks ago:

    https://thinkmarkets.wordpress.com/2009/04/29/two-interesting-models-of-urban-redevelopment/


  3. […] China does urban planning a little bit differently. As in, they destroy cities with people they don't like (Think Markets) […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: