Keynes on the Bismuth — Castor Oil Cycle

February 18, 2010
by Jerry O’Driscoll   

 J. M. Keynes was well-aware of the problems of conducting counter-cyclical policy to stabilize employment.   The problem is when to add stimulus, when to withdraw it, and not to overdo it.   

In Keynes’ Treatise on Money (1930), Keynes analogizes it to a family taking care of a sick child with doses of castor oil, a laxative. “It is as though different members of the family were to give successive doses to the child, each in ignorance of the doses given by the others. The child will be very ill.  Bismuth [an antidiarrheal] will then be administered on the same principle.Scientists will announce that children are subject a diarrhoea-constipation cycle, due, they will add, to the weather, or failing that, to alternations of optimism and pessimism amongst members of the family.”  

“If the time taken by the first dose to act is constant, they will discover that the cycle is a true one with a constant period.  Perhaps they will suggest that the remedy is to be found in giving the child bismuth when it is constipated and castor-oil at the other extreme.  But more probably the parents will divide into bismuth and castor-oil parties, one of which, impressed by the horrors of diarrhoea, will renounce castor-oil, and the other, moved by the depression of constipation, will abjure bismuth.”  

Today the U.S. economy has been pronounced to be very ill, and we must all take our medicine.  If the first dose doesn’t work, take more. When the inevitable consequences of oversdosing on spending become evident, scientists will administer the antidote of taxation. When that sends the patient back to bed, stimulus will be re-administered. And so on.  

Keynesians, please meet Mr. Keynes.

 

4 Responses to “Keynes on the Bismuth — Castor Oil Cycle”

  1. Mario Rizzo Says:

    This story is quite to the point. I should add that this was also Keynes’s view well into the thirties and forties. He was not an advocate of counter-cyclical policy but of the permanent social direction of investment and permanently low interest rates. He believed that stimulus followed from stability of investment and not vice versa. I wrote an article in the AEI online publication The American about this.

    http://www.american.com/archive/2009/february-2009/taking-the-name-of-lord-keynes-in-vain

    (The title is not my doing.)

  2. Bob D Says:

    The beatings (of the economy) will continue until the attitude (reelection prospects) improve!

  3. teageegeepea Says:

    For those who want something longer, Roger Garrison’s review of Allan Meltzer’s book on What Keynes REALLY meant (since there aren’t enough of such books) is here.


  4. Meltzer’s book on Keynes is important. I participated in a Liberty Fund colloquium on it many years ago. Thanks for the link to Roger’s review.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: