by Roger Koppl The NAS released a much-anticipated report on forensic science last month. The report said, “With the exception of nuclear DNA analysis, however, no forensic method has been rigorously shown to have the capacity to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or … Continue reading Now it’s official: forensic science is a mess
by Roger Koppl I’ve been railing against epistemic monopolies for a while now, particularly in forensic science. This project complements Peart and Levy’s work on experts. (See their symposium the 2008 Eastern Economics Journal, vol. 38 starting page 103.) I keep insisting that we need redundancy to reduce error rates. Economists, forensic scientists, and philosophers … Continue reading A Gem in the Folded Palm of Forensic Science
by Roger Koppl Forensic scientist Brian Gestring laments “The Dawn of the ‘Forensic Science Provocateur’” in the latest CAC News. That’s the newsletter of the California Association of Criminalists. He objects to the “peripheral waves of lawyers and business professors that have . . . found a new calling, that of Forensic Science Provocateur.” But … Continue reading Flaming torches and pitchforks
by Roger Koppl According to Associated Press, “Bahamas using 2 experts for Travolta son autopsy.” (HT Ed Lopez.) Actor John Travolta’s son Jett died tragically on Friday, January 2nd, after hitting his head in a fall. (It seems he had an illness that left him subject to seizures.) The E! News story says, “A government … Continue reading If redundancy is good enough for the rich and famous . . .