by Roger Koppl
The term “magical thinking” has different meanings, most of them involving something like extrasensory perception or the efficacy of spells. Here I define it as an argument, one of whose steps requires something impossible. (Larry White helped me with this definition, but gets no blame for it or anything I say here.) It is not magic thinking if your argument has an unexplained piece. Darwin knew didn’t have anything like Mendelevian genetics as a mechanism. That was a hole in his theory, eventually filled by others. No magic there. Magical thinking exists when one fills the gap with something that is logically or physically impossible.
If you can show I have engaged in magical thinking, you have overturned my argument. Continue reading